Purpose: To identify improvements to the model to enable comparisons of the evolution of the innovation ecosystem across regions within the same country.
Context: The Secretariat of Economic Development (SDE) of Santa Catarina encouraged mapping based on the Cukier, Kon, and Krueger (2015) model to monitor and compare different regions within and outside the state (SDS, 2017).
Diagnosis: The model proposed by Cukier, Kon, and Krueger (2015) suggests the comparison of multiple ecosystems, but encounters limitations when applied to ecosystems within the same country.
Originality: It enabled the comparison of different realities within the same country. Above all, it facilitated the self-analysis of each ecosystem to identify existing gaps.
Main Results: i) expansion of the sample size; ii) incorporation of additional data sources, such as interviews and secondary data; and iii) introduction of indicators that capture realities at the city level, rather than focusing solely on countries. These results allow comparisons of ecosystem evolution in different regions of the same country.
Practical, Theoretical, and Social Implications: It provided a consolidated information base and a reference point for measuring innovation ecosystems. It contributes to knowledge by proposing improvements to the model and presenting innovation results in the field of Administration and related fields. It aims to portray the current situation, enabling the design of improvement actions based on this panorama to contribute to the economic, social, and environmental development of the region. The practical results and the methodology applied in this project can serve as a basis for new studies that contribute to scientific advancement, knowledge dissemination, and relevant academic research.
Abstartup (2022). Acess in november/2022. Retrieved from: https://startupbase.com.br/home/startups?&query=
Aleisa, E. (2013) Startup Ecosystems: Study of the ecosystems around the world; focusing on Silicon Valley, Toronto and Moscow. Ebook. Retrieved from: https://www.janrecker.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/20130213_FinalReport_Startup-Ecosystems.pdf
Amcham (2021). Innovation News. Retrieved from: https://www.amcham.com.br/noticias/inovacao/conheca-os-melhores-ecossistemas-de-inovacao-do-mundo-1
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. (2021). Researching ecosystems in innovation contexts. Innovation & Management Review, 19(1), 12-25.
Arruda, C., Nogueira, V. S., Cozzi, A., & Costa, V. (2015). The Brazilian entrepreneurial ecosystem of startups: an analysis of entrepreneurship determinants in Brazil and the perceptions around the Brazilian regulatory framework. Entrepreneurship in BRICS: Policy and research to support entrepreneurs, 9-26.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11412-5_2
Asheim, B. T.; Gertler, M. S. The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems. The Oxford handbook of innovation, p. 291-317, 2005.
Bell-Masterson, J., & Stangler, D. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Available at SSRN 2580336.https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580336
Cassiolato, J. E., & Lastres, H. M. M. (2005). Sistemas de inovação e desenvolvimento: as implicações de política. São Paulo em perspectiva, 19, 34-45.
CRCGO (2022) News from the Regional Accounting Council of Goiás. Retrieved from https://crcgo.org.br/
Cukier, D., Kon, F., & Krueger, N. (2015). Towards a maturity model for software startup ecosystems. Department of Computer Science-University of São Paulo Technical Report RT-MAC. Retrieved from https://ccsl.ime.usp.br/startups/assets/profes2015short.pdf
Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Ortt, J. R. (2018). Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 18-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028
Fonseca, M. (2021. Além da “Ilha do Silício”: como Santa Catarina está levando fábricas de startups ao interior. InfoMoney, february, 27. Retrieved from: https://www.infomoney.com.br/negocios/alem-da-ilha-do-silicio-como-santa-catarina-esta-levando-fabricas-de-startups-ao-interior/
Frenkel, A., & Maital, S. (2014). Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems: Foundations for Policy Consensus. Edward Elgar Publishing, London, UK.
Garcia, R. D. C., Serra, M. D. A., Mascarini, S., Bastos, L. D. S., & Macedo, R. (2022). Revisitando os Sistemas Regionais de Inovação: teoria, prática, políticas e agenda para o Brasil. Nova Economia, 32(03), 617-645.
Gomes, L. A.de V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018). Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 30-48.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009
Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard business review, 88(6),40-50. Retrieved from: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5419320/mod_resource/content/1/Harvard-Ecosystem.pdf
La Rovere, R. L., de Oliveira Santos, G., & Vasconcellos, B. L. X. (2021). Desafios para a mensuração de Ecossistemas de Inovação e de Ecossistemas de Empreendedorismo no Brasil. Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 10(1), 6.https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.v10i1.1971
Lima, S. C. (2024). Sistemas regionais de inovação nas regiões europeias: O papel dos ecossistemas de inovação. Dissertação de mestrado. Gestão e Internacionalização de empresas. Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão. Porto, Portugal.
Matos, G. P., & Teixeira, C. S. (2022). A evolução histórica e as diferentes analogias dos ecossistemas de inovação. In Anais do CongressoInternacional de Conhecimento e Inovação–ciki (Vol. 1, No. 1).https://doi.org/10.48090/ciki.v1i1.1328
Peres, W. D.G., Bencke, F. F., &Lazzarotti, F. (2021) A extensão universitária, científica e tecnológica como meio de conexão para relações do modelo tríplice hélice de inovação no contexto interiorano brasileiro. XLV Encontro da ANPAD - EnANPAD 2021On-line - 4 - 8 de out de 2021. 2177-2576 versão online.
Ries, E. (2012) A Startup Enxuta. São Paulo: Leya. 275p
Russo-Spena, T.; Tregua, M.; Bifulco, F. (2017) Searching through the jungle of innovation conceptualisations: System, network and ecosystem perspectives. Journal of Service TheoryandPractive, v. 27, n. 5, p. 977–1005.https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-10-2015-0224
SDS (2017) Secretaria de Estado de DesenvolvimentoEconômicoSustentável, Santa Catarina. Guia de Implantação dos Centros de Inovação: LivroII - Plano de Implantação.Secretaria de Estado de DesenvolvimentoEconômicoSustentável. Florianópolis: SDS.
Silva, P., Pires, S. M., & Teles, F. (2021). Explanatory models of regional innovation performance in Europe: policy implications for regions. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34(4), 609-631.
Solodilova, N. Z., Malikov, R. I., & Grishin, K. E. (2018). Methodological tools to measure the state of regional entrepreneurial ecosystem. Ekonomikaregiona Economy of Regions, (4), 1256. Retrieved from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/5ef046d0999e5209bf549fb4fc7b9a66/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=5002427
Stam, E., & Van de Ven, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56, 809-832.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6
Torres, N. N. J., & de Souza, C. R. (2016). Uma revisão da literatura sobre ecossistemas de Startups de tecnologia. Anais do XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação, 385-392.
Tripathi, N., Seppänen, P., Boominathan, G., Oivo, M., &Liukkunen, K. (2019). Insights into startup ecosystems through exploration of multi-vocal literature. Information and Software Technology, 105, 56-77.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2018.08.005
Valkokari, K. (2015). Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: How they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technology innovation management review, 5(8), 17-24. Retrieved from: https://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Valkokari_TIMReview_August2015.pdf
Zen, A. C., Santos, D. A. G., Faccin, K., & Gonçalves, L. F. (2019). Mapeamento do ecossistema de inovação: Percepções e desafios. Pacto Alegre.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Revista Alcance is a Brazilian free access journal, published every four months, linked to the Graduate Program in Administration and the Professional Master’s degree in Administration, Internationalization and Logistics Program of the University of Vale do Itajaí – Univali. We seek to publish theoretical-empirical and technological articles in the areas of Business Administration. Different theoretical and methodological perspectives are welcome, as long as they are consistent with and relevant to the development of the area.