• Abstract

    DECIPHERING INTERACTION WITH COMPANIES AND MARKET ORIENTATION AMONG RESEARCHERS IN BRAZIL

    Published date: 11/12/2024

    Objective: To explore market orientation and interaction with companies among academic researchers in Brazil, examining how these aspects vary according to areas of education and gender.

    Design/methodology/approach: Use of a quantitative methodology, based on data collected through questionnaires directed at a representative sample of Brazilian researchers.

    Results: The study identifies a significant positive correlation between market orientation and interaction with companies. Engineering and Agricultural Sciences show higher levels of these characteristics, while Health Sciences and Humanities display lower levels.

    Limitations/research implications: The results are specific to the Brazilian context, limiting generalization to other contexts without further studies. Low response rate from researchers and possible lack of representation in some specific areas of education.

    Practical implications: The study suggests the creation of programs that encourage researchers to engage with the business sector. The development of institutional policies that facilitate and value partnerships between universities and companies, such as incentives for collaborative projects and simplification of processes, is recommended.

    Social implications: Promoting greater collaboration between universities and companies can result in innovations that benefit the whole of society.

    Theoretical implications: This study contributes to the theory by demonstrating how market orientation and interaction with the business sector can vary among different areas of education and genders. It challenges previous perspectives by highlighting the need for approaches that consider the specificities of each area and gender differences.

    Originality/value: This study broadens the understanding of interactions between the academic and private sectors in Brazil, offering new evidence on how the area of education and gender influence these dynamics. The study introduces insights for the development of more effective strategies for collaboration and market orientation, contributing to the formulation of public policies that promote greater inclusion and equity in university-company interaction.

  • References

    Albuquerque, E., Suzigan, W., Arza, V., & Dutrénit, G. (2015). Matrices of university–firm interactions in Latin America. In Developing National Systems of Innovation (pp. 194–218). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711108.00016

    Ankrah, S., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003

    Awasthy, R., Flint, S., Sankarnarayana, R., & Jones, R. L. (2020). A framework to improve university–industry collaboration. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, 2(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIUC-09-2019-0016

    Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2006). Entpreprenerial Universities and Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Knowledge-Based Economic Development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5029-z

    Boardman, P. C. (2009). Government centrality to university–industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers. Research Policy, 38(10), 1505–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.008

    Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8

    Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006

    Cassiolato, J. E., & Lastres, H. M. M. (2000). LOCAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION IN MERCOSUR COUNTRIES. Industry and Innovation, 7(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/713670250

    Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D. Science, 48(1), 1–23. https://about.jstor.org/terms

    Cooke, P. (2001). Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 945–974. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.4.945

    Corsino, M., & Torrisi, S. (2023). University engagement in open innovation and intellectual property: evidence from university–industry collaborations. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 50(4), 781–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40812-023-00280-2/TABLES/4

    Crenshaw, K. W. (2013). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). Routledge.

    Cumming, G. (2014). The New Statistics: Why and How. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504966/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0956797613504966-FIG7.JPEG

    da Silva, J. A., Sartori, R., da Silva, J. A., & Sartori, R. (2022). Motivations and barriers of university-industry cooperation: a comparison between Brazil and Ireland. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 17(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242022000200049

    D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-010-9153-Z/TABLES/7

    Etzkowitz, H., & Gupta, N. (2006). Women in Science: A Fair Shake? Minerva, 44(2), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-006-0007-7

    Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

    Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4

    Fernández-Pérez de la Lastra, S., Foncubierta-Rodríguez, M. J., & Sánchez-Gardey, G. (2023). Toward classification of transfer research: an exploratory analysis based on indicators of academic engagement of knowledge transfer in academia–industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-023-10015-Z/TABLES/4

    FOX, M. F. (2001). WOMEN, SCIENCE, AND ACADEMIA. Gender & Society, 15(5), 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124301015005002

    Frank, A. G., Cortimiglia, M. N., Ribeiro, J. L. D., & Oliveira, L. S. de. (2016). The effect of innovation activities on innovation outputs in the Brazilian industry: Market-orientation vs. technology-acquisition strategies. Research Policy, 45(3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2015.11.011

    Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2017). The effect of entrepreneurship on economic development—an empirical analysis using regional entrepreneurship culture. Journal of Economic Geography, 17(1), 157–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbv049

    Galán-Muros, V., & Plewa, C. (2016). What drives and inhibits university-business cooperation in Europe? A comprehensive assessement. R and D Management, 46(2), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12180

    Geuna, A., & Muscio, A. (2009). The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: A Critical Review of the Literature. Minerva, 47(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-009-9118-2

    Ghauri, P., & Rosendo-Rios, V. (2016). Organizational cross-cultural differences in the context of innovation-oriented partnerships. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(1), 128–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-06-2014-0059

    Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9377-4

    Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.004

    Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage.

    Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.006

    Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2008.01.008

    Hillerbrand, R., & Werker, C. (2019). Values in University–Industry Collaborations: The Case of Academics Working at Universities of Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(6), 1633–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11948-019-00144-W/TABLES/1

    Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400201

    Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441

    Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature 2013 504:7479, 504(7479), 211–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/504211a

    Lee, T., & Tsai, H. (2005). The effects of business operation mode on market orientation, learning orientation and innovativeness. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570510590147

    Lee, Y. S. (2000). The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer 2000 25:2, 25(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007895322042

    Leydesdorff, L. (2020). Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2356–2364. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_452

    McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Https://Doi.Org/10.1086/426800, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800

    Mendoza, P., & Öcal, S. D. (2022). Faculty Engagement in University–Industry Linkages in Turkey and the United States: National Technocenters versus Ecosystems of Knowledge. Higher Education, 84(4), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-021-00796-3/METRICS

    Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Ziedonis, A. A., Sampat, B. N., & Snowdon, K. (2004). Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 34(3), 134–138. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ivory-tower-industrial-innovation-university/docview/221135870/se-2

    Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757

    Nielsen, M. W., Alegria, S., Börjeson, L., Etzkowitz, H., Falk-Krzesinski, H. J., Joshi, A., Leahey, E., Smith-Doerr, L., Woolley, A. W., & Schiebinger, L. (2017). Gender diversity leads to better science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(8), 1740–1742. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1700616114/ASSET/BAA76FB6-0692-440D-91CA-AC73D1477441/ASSETS/GRAPHIC/PNAS.1700616114FIG02.JPEG

    Nsanzumuhire, S. U., & Groot, W. (2020). Context perspective on University-Industry Collaboration processes: A systematic review of literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120861

    O’Dwyer, M., Filieri, R., & O’Malley, L. (2023). Establishing successful university–industry collaborations: barriers and enablers deconstructed. Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(3), 900–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-022-09932-2/TABLES/8

    Olmos-Peñuela, J., Castro-Martínez, E., & D’Este, P. (2014). Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents. Research Policy, 43(4), 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.004

    O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34(7), 994–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011

    Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1

    Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2012.09.007

    Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1468-2370.2007.00225.X

    Philbin, S. (2008). Process model for university-industry research collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 488–521. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060810911138/FULL/PDF

    Plewa, C., Korff, N., Johnson, C., MacPherson, G., Baaken, T., & Rampersad, G. C. (2013). The evolution of university–industry linkages—A framework. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENGTECMAN.2012.11.005

    Plewa, C., & Quester, P. (2006). The effect of a university’s market orientation on the industry partner’s relationship perception and satisfaction. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2006.011306

    Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165

    Rapini, M. S., Chiarini, T., & Bittencourt, P. F. (2017). Obstacles to innovation in Brazil: The lack of qualified individuals to implement innovation and establish university–firm interactions. Industry and Higher Education, 31(3), 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422217698524

    Rapini, M. S., da Motta e Albuquerque, E., Chave, C. V., Silva, L. A., de Souza, S. G. A., Righi, H. M., & Cruz, W. M. S. da. (2009). University–industry interactions in an immature system of innovation: evidence from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Science and Public Policy, 36(5), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209X442016

    Rossoni, A. L., de Vasconcellos, E. P. G., & de Castilho Rossoni, R. L. (2023). Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review. Management Review Quarterly 2023, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11301-023-00349-1

    Rothaermel, F. T., Agung, S. D., & Jiang, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691–791. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm023

    Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry–university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7), 1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1

    Schlosser, F. K., & McNaughton, R. B. (2009). Using the I-MARKOR scale to identify market-oriented individuals in the financial services sector. Journal of Services Marketing, 23(4), 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040910965575/FULL/PDF

    Sharma, P. (2022). A Framework to Manage University–Industry Technology Transfer. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 19(08). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987702250033X

    Shi, L., & Wang, L. (2023). Understanding university-industry collaboration from the perspective of proximity: insights from a case study in China. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2023.2251606

    Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00007-5

    Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44824369_Academic_Capitalism_Politics_Policies_and_the_Entrepreneurial_University

    Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Inst Pr.

    Sutz, J. (2000). The university–industry–government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, 29(2), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00066-9

    Suzigan, W., & Albuquerque, E. da M. e. (2011). The underestimated role of universities for the Brazilian system of innovation. Revista de Economia Política, 31(1), 03–30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31572011000100001

    Tartari, V., & Salter, A. (2015). The engagement gap:: Exploring gender differences in University – Industry collaboration activities. Research Policy, 44(6), 1176–1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2015.01.014

    The Jamovi Project. (2023). jamovi (Version 2.3). [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.

    Thiaw, C. A. L. (2021). Marketing – Marketing of Innovation and University–Industry Collaboration. Innovation Economics, Engineering and Management Handbook 2, 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119832522.CH22

    Thursby, M., Thursby, J., & Gupta-Mukherjee, S. (2007). Are there real effects of licensing on academic research? A life cycle view. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.016

    Whittington, K. B., & Smith-Doerr, L. (2005). Gender and Commercial Science: Women’s Patenting in the Life Sciences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(4), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-2581-5

    Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 847. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657505

Revista Alcance

Revista Alcance is a Brazilian free access journal, published every four months, linked to the Graduate Program in Administration and the Professional Master’s degree in Administration, Internationalization and Logistics Program of the University of Vale do Itajaí – Univali. We seek to publish theoretical-empirical and technological articles in the areas of Business Administration. Different theoretical and methodological perspectives are welcome, as long as they are consistent with and relevant to the development of the area.

Access journal