• Resumen

    FLEXIBILIDAD COGNITIVA Y AUTOEFICACIA EMPRESARIAL: UN ESTUDIO SOBRE SU INFLUENCIA EN EL COMPORTAMIENTO EMPRENDEDOR DE LÍDERES INTERNACIONALES

    DOI 10.14210/alcance.v29n1(Jan/Abr).p20-34
    Published date: 24/02/2022
    Objetivo: Analizar la influencia de la Flexibilidad Cognitiva y la Autoeficacia Emprendedora en el comportamiento emprendedor de líderes internacionales representantes de jóvenes emprendedores de la Alianza de Jóvenes Emprendedores (G20 YEA - Alianza de Jóvenes Emprendedores) y la Federación Iberoamericana de Jóvenes Emprendedores (FIJE). Procedimientos metodológicos: El estudio tiene un enfoque mixto, utilizando técnicas cualitativas, con la aplicación de Análisis Cualitativo Comparativo de Conjuntos Difusos (fsQCA) y cuantitativo, con comparación de parámetros en diferentes muestras. Se estudiaron veintidós líderes mundiales que representan a jóvenes emprendedores del G20 YEA y FIJE. Resultados: Los resultados del análisis comparativo mostraron que la presencia de Flexibilidad Cognitiva (FC) y la iniciativa para crear sus propios negocios es una configuración necesaria para la Auto eficiencia Empresarial (EA). Los líderes que iniciaron sus propios negocios obtuvieron puntajes de CF y EA más altos en comparación con los líderes que asumieron empresas familiares. Originalidad e implicaciones teóricas del estudio: Si bien el emprendimiento se estudia en varias áreas del conocimiento desde la economía hasta la psicología (Baron y Shane, 2005), existen lagunas en cuanto a la comprensión de los procesos cognitivos subyacentes al comportamiento empresarial. Este estudio busca contribuir a la construcción de una nueva comprensión para el desarrollo de un modelo teórico integrador que reconozca el impacto de las funciones ejecutivas, es decir, la flexibilidad cognitiva, como esencial en el comportamiento emprendedor.
  • Citas

    Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2012). Growth and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9307-2.

    Anson, P. (2017). What makes an entrepreneur? Capturado de: http://blog.positiveonline.org.uk/post/149741177700/what-makes-an-entrepreneur

    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

    Baron, R. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic ‘‘why’’ questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 221-239.

    Baron, R. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 167-182, doi: 10.1002/sej.12

    Barrett-Pink, C., Alison, L., & Maskell, S. (2018). The air defenses task: understanding what motivates automation usage to support classification decisions in practice. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool.

    Boyd, N. G. & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63-77.

    Bullard, O., Penner, S., & Main, K. (2019). Can implicit theory influence construal level? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(4), 563-702.

    Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2009). Understanding the entrepreneurial mind: Opening the black box (Vol. 24): Springer Science & Business Media.

    Chantarangsi W., Liu W., Bretz f., Kiatsupaibul S., Hayter, A. J., & Wan, F. (2015) Normal probability plots with confidence. Biom J. 57(1), 52-63.

    Chen, C., Greene, P., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295-316.

    Clercq, D., Sapienza, H., & Zhou, L. (2014). Entrepreneurial strategic posture and learning effort in international ventures: The moderating roles of operational flexibilities. International Business Review, October, 23(5), 981-992.

    CONAJE. A Conaje é uma entidade que atua com base nos pilares de representatividade, inspiração, integração, gestão e desenvolvimento. Recuperado de http://conaje.com.br/institucional.

    Cranti, J. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 42-49.

    de Holan, P. (2014). It's All in Your Head: Why We Need Neuroentrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(1), 93–97

    De Noble, A., Jung, D., & Ehrlich, S. (1999). Entrepreneurial self- efficacy: the development of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial actions. Trabajo presentado al Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Waltham.

    Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241-253.

    Di Fabio, A., Bucci, O., & Gori, A. (2016). High entrepreneurship, leadership, and professionalism (HELP): toward an integrated, empirically based perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1842.

    Eesley, C., Roberts, E. B., Tian, X., & Yang, D. (2014). Institutional Flexibility and Entrepreneurship. Working Paper n. 543 Capturado de https://globalpoverty.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/pub/543wp.pdf

    Feuerschütte, S. G.; Alperstedt, G. D. & Godoi, C. K. (2012). Empreendedorismo e competência: um ensaio sobre complementaridade e convergência dos constructos. Revista Eletrônica de Gestão Organizacional. 10(3), 509-538.

    FIJE. Quiénes somos. Recuperado de http://www.fije.org/quienes-somos/.

    Fuller, B., Liu, Y., Bajaba, S., Marler, L. & Pratt, J. (2018). Examining how the personality, self-efficacy, and anticipatory cognitions of potential entrepreneurs shape their entrepreneurial intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 125(4), 120–125. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.005

    G20 YEA. Our Charter. Recuperado de http://www.g20yea.com/index.php/our-charter.

    Gazzaniga, M.; Ivry, R.; & Mangun, G. (2002) Cognitive neuroscience: the biology of the mind. New York, NY: Norton & Company.

    Gil, R. (2002). Neuropsicologia. São Paulo: Editora Santos.

    Guerra, C. G. (2012). Flexibilidade cognitiva e rendimento escolar: estudo com os alunos do Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre [Cognitive flexibility and school performance: a study with the students of the Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre]. In: III Seminário de I&DT C3i – Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação e Inovação do Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre.

    Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. 6. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

    Harrell, F. E. (2001). Missing Data. In F. E. Harrell (Org.), Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis (p. 41–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1_3

    Hernández S. R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (2006). Metodologia de pesquisa. 3. ed. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill.

    Hisrich, R., Langan-Fox, J., & Grant, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship research and practice: a call to action for psychology. The American Psychologist, 62(6), 575-589.

    Johnson, B. T. (2016). The relationship between cognitive flexibility, coping, and symptomatology in psychotherapy. Master's Theses. Paper 354.

    Jung, D. I.; Ehrlich, S. B.; De Noble, A. F. & Baik, K. B. (2001). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and its relationship to entrepreneurial action: a comparative study between the US and Korea. Management International, 6(1), 41-54.

    Kickul, J.; Gundry, L. K.; Barbosa, S. D. & Whitcancak, L. (2009). Intuition versus analysis? testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process. Entreprenurship Theory and Practice (ET&P), march.

    Kloo, D., Perner, J., Kerschhuber, A., Aichhorns, M., & Schimidhuber. (2010). Perspective taking and cognitive flexibility in the Dimensional Change Card Sorting (DCCS) task. Cognitive Development, 25, 208-217.

    Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research–the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 15-33.

    Lechner, C., Sortheix, F., Obschonka, M. & Salmelo-Aro (1028). What drives future business leaders´How work values and gender shape young adults entrepreneurial and leadership aspirations. Journal of Vocational Behavior 107, 57-70.

    Lezak, M., Howieson, D., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–27.

    Lizote, S. A., Verdinelli, M. A., & Silveira, A. (2013). Relação entre autoeficácia e competências empreendedoras de gerentes com o desempenho das empresas instaladas em incubadoras tecnológicas de Santa Catarina, Brasil. In: Congresso Latino-Iberoamericano De Gestão De Tecnologia, 15., 2013, Portugal. Anais. Portugal: ALTEC. CD-ROMa.

    Malloy - Diniz, L. F., Sedo, M.; Fuentes, D., & Leite, W. B. (2008). Neuropsicologia das funções executivas. In Fuentes, L. F. Malloy – Diniz, C. H. P. Camargo, & R. M. Cozenza. (Eds.), Neuropsicologia: teoria e prática. (pp 187-206).Porto Alegre: Artmed.

    Marxt, C., Kraus, S., & Zagorac-Uremovic, Z. (2018). The role of cognitive flexibility in entrepreneurial opportunity recognition. Management, 29, 62-72.

    Mauer, R., Neergaard, H., & Linstad, A. K. (2009). Self-efficacy: Conditioning the entrepreneurial mindset Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind (pp. 233–257): Springer.

    Mauer, R., Neergaard, H., & Linstad, A. K. (2017). Self-efficacy: Conditioning the entrepreneurial mindset Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind (pp. 293–317): Springer

    McGee, J., Peterson, M., Mueller, S., & Sequeira, J. (2009). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965–988.

    McMullen, Z. , Plummer, L. &. Acs, Z. (2007). What is an entrepreneurial opportunity? Small Business Economics, 28, 273-283.

    Miao, C., Qian, S., & Ma, D. (2017). The relationship between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and firm performance: a meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 87-107.

    Moriano, J. A.; Palací, F. J. & Morales, J. F. (2006). Adaptación y validación en España de la escala de autoeficacia emprendedora. Revista de Psicología Social, 21(1), 51-64.

    Morin, E., Ciurana, E. R., & Motta, R. D. (2002). Educar en la era planetaria: el pensamiento complejo como método de aprendizaje en el error y la incertidumbre humana [Educating in the planetary age: complex thinking as a method of learning in human error and uncertainty]. Salamanca: Universidad de Valladolid.

    Muyan-Yılık, M., & Demir, A. (2019). A pathway towards subjective well-being for Turkish university students: the roles of dispositional hope, cognitive flexibility, and coping strategies. Journal of Happiness Studies. 12(1), 334-352.

    Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L., & Spector, T. (2009). Opportunity recognition and the tendency to be an entrepreneur: a bivariate genetics perspective, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 108–117.

    Obschonka, M. , Hahn, E., Bajwa, N., (2018). Personal agency in newly arrived refugees: the role of personality, entrepreneurial cognitions and intentions, and career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 105, 173-184.

    Oshiro, K., Nagaoka, S., & Shimizu, E. (2016). Development and validation of the Japanese version of cognitive flexibility scale. BMC Research Notes. 34(28), 345-359.

    Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1997). The end of certainty. Simon and Schuster.

    Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage. Political Analysis 14(3):291-310.

    Reis, E. (1997). Estatística multivariada. Lisboa: Edições Silabo Ltda.

    Ribeiro, T. M., & Teixeira, R. M. (2012). A criação de negócios por empreendedores jovens: estudo de casos múltiplos no Estado de Sergipe. Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 1(1), 72-100.

    Roshani, F., Piri, R., Malek, A., Michel, T. M., & Vafaee, M. S. (2019). Comparison of cognitive flexibility, appropriate risk-taking and reaction time in individuals with and without adult ADHD. Psychiatry Research. 32(12), 567-581.

    Salanova, M.; Grau, R.; Llorens, S. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). Exposición a las tecnologías de la información, burnout y engagement: el rol modulador de la autoeficacia profesional. Psicología Social Aplicada, 11(1), 69-89.

    Sanchez, J., & Hernández-Sánchez, B. (2013). Gender, personal traits, and entrepreneurial intentions. Business and Management Research. 3(10), 456-479.

    Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets: agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comparative Sociology. 9(2), 376-396.

    Segal, G., Borgia, D. & Schoenfeld, J. (2002). Using social cognitive career theory to predict self-employment goals. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 47-56.

    Shepherd, D. A. & Krueger, N. F., Jr. (2002). An intentions-based model of entrepreneurial teams’ social cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 167-185.

    Silva Filho, S. D., & Lizote, S. A. (2019). Autoeficácia e orientação empreendedora: uma análise de suas relações em pequenas empresas de moda íntima. Revista da Micro e Pequena Empresa, 13(1), 78-103.

    Simões, A. M. P. (2016). Autoeficácia empreendedora no ensino superior: o caso dos estudantes do Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra. Dissertação (Mestrado em Comunicação Organizacional: Cidadania, Confiança e Responsabilidade Social). Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra.

    Smith, B., Matthews, C. & Schenkel, M. (2009). Differences in entrepreneurial opportunities: the role of tacitness and codification in opportunity identification, Journal of Small Business Management, 47(1), 38-57.

    Spiro, R., & Jehng, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In Don Nix & R. Spiro (Eds) Cognitions, education, and multimedia: exploring ideas in high technology (162-205). Hillsdale, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Spiro, R., Vispael, W, Schimtz, J. Samarapungavam, M., & Boerger, (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer complex content domains. In B. Britton & S. Glynn (Eds). Executive Central in Process in Reading (pp. 177-199). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Sternberg, R. (2004). Successful intelligence as a basis for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing , 19(2), 0–201.

    Sung, E., Chang, J. H., Lee, S., & Park, S. H. (2019). The moderating effect of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between work stress and psychological symptoms in Korean air force pilots. Military Psychology, 31(2), 100-106.

    Thiem, A., & Dusa, A. (2012). Introducing the QCA Package: a market analysis and software review. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research. 10 (2), 45-9.

    Thiem, A., & Dusa, A. (2013). QCA: a package for Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The R Journal. 5(87), 345-367.

    Tolentino, L., Sedoglavich, V., Lu, V.; Garcia, P. & Restubog, S. (2014). The role of career adaptability in predicting entrepreneurial intentions: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 403–412. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.09.002.

    Treffers, T., Welpe, I. M., Spörrle, M., & Picot, A. O. (2017). The role of emotions and cognitions in the pre-entrepreneurial process: what's new? Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind (pp. 243–259), Springer.

    Turan-Ozpolat, E. (2020). Prediction of entrepreneurship of pre-service teachers based on cognitive flexibility and self-efficacy belief. educational policy analysis and strategic research, Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 15(2), 239-258.

    Vignochi, L., Lezana, A. G. R., & Paines, P. A. (2020). associações entre estilos cognitivos, flexibilidade e perfil de liderança empreendedora de universitários. Revista Alcance, 27(3), 276-292.

    Ward, T.(2004). Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 0–188.

    Welsh, D., Tullar, W., & Nemati, H. (2016). Entrepreneurship education: process, method, or both? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 12(2), 345-379.

    World Economic Forum (2009). Educating the next wave of entrepreneurs: unlocking entrepreneurial capabilities to meet the global challenges of the 21st century. Geneva: Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    World Economic Forum (2016). Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum Annual Report. Capturado de http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf.

    Yu, Y., Yu, Y., & Lin, Y. (2019). Anxiety and depression aggravate impulsiveness: the mediating and moderating role of cognitive flexibility. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 12(1), 1-12.

    Zhao, H.; Seibert, S. & Hills, G. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272.

    Zhoua, X., Mengb , Y., Schmitta, H., Montaga, C., Kendricka, K., & Becker, B. (2020). Cognitive flexibility mediates the association between early life stress and habitual behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 1-8 110231

Revista Alcance

La Revista Alcance es una revista brasileña de libre acceso, con publicación cua-trimestral, vinculada al Programa de Posgrado en Administración y Programa de Maestría Profesional en Administración - Gestión, Internacionalización y Logística de la Universidade do Vale do Itajaí – Univali. Buscamos publicar artículos de traba-jos teóricos-empíricos y tecnológicos en las áreas de Administración. Diferentes perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas son bienvenidas, desde que sean consisten-tes y relevantes para el desarrollo del área. 

Access journal