• Resumo

    FLEXIBILIDADE COGNITIVA E AUTOEFICÁCIA EMPREENDEDORA: UM ESTUDO SOBRE SUA INFLUÊNCIA NO COMPORTAMENTO EMPREENDEDOR DOS LÍDERES INTERNACIONAIS

    Data de publicação: 24/02/2022
    Objetivo: Analisar a influência da Flexibilidade Cognitiva e Autoeficácia Empreendedora no comportamento empreendedor dos líderes internacionais representantes de jovens empreendedores da Aliança de Jovens Empreendedores (G20 YEA - Young Entrepreneurs’ Alliance) e da Federação Ibero-americana de Jovens Empresários (FIJE). Metodologia: O estudo tem abordagem mista, com uso de técnicas qualitativas, com aplicação de Análise Qualitativa Comparativa de Conjuntos Difusos (fsQCA ) e quantitativas, com comparação de parâmetros em amostras diferentes. Foram estudados vinte e dois líderes mundiais representantes de jovens empreendedores da G20 YEA e FIJE. Principais resultados: Os resultados da análise comparativa apontaram que a presença de Flexibilidade Cognitiva (FC) e iniciativa de criação de negócios próprios é uma configuração necessária para a Autoeficácia Empreendedora (AE). Líderes que iniciaram seus próprios negócios possuiam escores mais altos de FC e AE quando comparados com líderes que assumiram negócios familiares. Originalidade e implicações teóricas do estudo: Apesar do empreendedorismo ser estudado em diversas áreas do conhecimento, desde a economia à psicologia (Baron, & Shane, 2005), existem lacunas no que diz respeito à compreensão dos processos cognitivos subjacentes ao comportamento empreendedor. Este estudo busca contribuir com a construção de uma nova compreensão para o desenvolvimento de um modelo teórico integrativo, que reconheça o impacto das funções executivas, nomeadamente a flexibilidade cognitiva, como essencial no comportamento empreendedor.
  • Referências

    Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2012). Growth and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39(2), 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9307-2.

    Anson, P. (2017). What makes an entrepreneur? Capturado de: http://blog.positiveonline.org.uk/post/149741177700/what-makes-an-entrepreneur

    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.

    Baron, R. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic ‘‘why’’ questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 221-239.

    Baron, R. (2007). Behavioral and cognitive factors in entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurs as the active element in new venture creation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 167-182, doi: 10.1002/sej.12

    Barrett-Pink, C., Alison, L., & Maskell, S. (2018). The air defenses task: understanding what motivates automation usage to support classification decisions in practice. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool.

    Boyd, N. G. & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(4), 63-77.

    Bullard, O., Penner, S., & Main, K. (2019). Can implicit theory influence construal level? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(4), 563-702.

    Carsrud, A., & Brännback, M. (2009). Understanding the entrepreneurial mind: Opening the black box (Vol. 24): Springer Science & Business Media.

    Chantarangsi W., Liu W., Bretz f., Kiatsupaibul S., Hayter, A. J., & Wan, F. (2015) Normal probability plots with confidence. Biom J. 57(1), 52-63.

    Chen, C., Greene, P., & Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 295-316.

    Clercq, D., Sapienza, H., & Zhou, L. (2014). Entrepreneurial strategic posture and learning effort in international ventures: The moderating roles of operational flexibilities. International Business Review, October, 23(5), 981-992.

    CONAJE. A Conaje é uma entidade que atua com base nos pilares de representatividade, inspiração, integração, gestão e desenvolvimento. Recuperado de http://conaje.com.br/institucional.

    Cranti, J. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 42-49.

    de Holan, P. (2014). It's All in Your Head: Why We Need Neuroentrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry, 23(1), 93–97

    De Noble, A., Jung, D., & Ehrlich, S. (1999). Entrepreneurial self- efficacy: the development of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial actions. Trabajo presentado al Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Waltham.

    Dennis, J. P., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2010). The cognitive flexibility inventory: instrument development and estimates of reliability and validity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 241-253.

    Di Fabio, A., Bucci, O., & Gori, A. (2016). High entrepreneurship, leadership, and professionalism (HELP): toward an integrated, empirically based perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1842.

    Eesley, C., Roberts, E. B., Tian, X., & Yang, D. (2014). Institutional Flexibility and Entrepreneurship. Working Paper n. 543 Capturado de https://globalpoverty.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/pub/543wp.pdf

    Feuerschütte, S. G.; Alperstedt, G. D. & Godoi, C. K. (2012). Empreendedorismo e competência: um ensaio sobre complementaridade e convergência dos constructos. Revista Eletrônica de Gestão Organizacional. 10(3), 509-538.

    FIJE. Quiénes somos. Recuperado de http://www.fije.org/quienes-somos/.

    Fuller, B., Liu, Y., Bajaba, S., Marler, L. & Pratt, J. (2018). Examining how the personality, self-efficacy, and anticipatory cognitions of potential entrepreneurs shape their entrepreneurial intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 125(4), 120–125. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.005

    G20 YEA. Our Charter. Recuperado de http://www.g20yea.com/index.php/our-charter.

    Gazzaniga, M.; Ivry, R.; & Mangun, G. (2002) Cognitive neuroscience: the biology of the mind. New York, NY: Norton & Company.

    Gil, R. (2002). Neuropsicologia. São Paulo: Editora Santos.

    Guerra, C. G. (2012). Flexibilidade cognitiva e rendimento escolar: estudo com os alunos do Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre [Cognitive flexibility and school performance: a study with the students of the Polytechnic Institute of Portalegre]. In: III Seminário de I&DT C3i – Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação e Inovação do Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre.

    Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. 6. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

    Harrell, F. E. (2001). Missing Data. In F. E. Harrell (Org.), Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis (p. 41–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1_3

    Hernández S. R. H., Collado, C. F., & Lucio, P. B. (2006). Metodologia de pesquisa. 3. ed. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill.

    Hisrich, R., Langan-Fox, J., & Grant, S. (2007). Entrepreneurship research and practice: a call to action for psychology. The American Psychologist, 62(6), 575-589.

    Johnson, B. T. (2016). The relationship between cognitive flexibility, coping, and symptomatology in psychotherapy. Master's Theses. Paper 354.

    Jung, D. I.; Ehrlich, S. B.; De Noble, A. F. & Baik, K. B. (2001). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and its relationship to entrepreneurial action: a comparative study between the US and Korea. Management International, 6(1), 41-54.

    Kickul, J.; Gundry, L. K.; Barbosa, S. D. & Whitcancak, L. (2009). Intuition versus analysis? testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation process. Entreprenurship Theory and Practice (ET&P), march.

    Kloo, D., Perner, J., Kerschhuber, A., Aichhorns, M., & Schimidhuber. (2010). Perspective taking and cognitive flexibility in the Dimensional Change Card Sorting (DCCS) task. Cognitive Development, 25, 208-217.

    Kraus, S., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Schüssler, M. (2018). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research–the rise of a method. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(1), 15-33.

    Lechner, C., Sortheix, F., Obschonka, M. & Salmelo-Aro (1028). What drives future business leaders´How work values and gender shape young adults entrepreneurial and leadership aspirations. Journal of Vocational Behavior 107, 57-70.

    Lezak, M., Howieson, D., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–27.

    Lizote, S. A., Verdinelli, M. A., & Silveira, A. (2013). Relação entre autoeficácia e competências empreendedoras de gerentes com o desempenho das empresas instaladas em incubadoras tecnológicas de Santa Catarina, Brasil. In: Congresso Latino-Iberoamericano De Gestão De Tecnologia, 15., 2013, Portugal. Anais. Portugal: ALTEC. CD-ROMa.

    Malloy - Diniz, L. F., Sedo, M.; Fuentes, D., & Leite, W. B. (2008). Neuropsicologia das funções executivas. In Fuentes, L. F. Malloy – Diniz, C. H. P. Camargo, & R. M. Cozenza. (Eds.), Neuropsicologia: teoria e prática. (pp 187-206).Porto Alegre: Artmed.

    Marxt, C., Kraus, S., & Zagorac-Uremovic, Z. (2018). The role of cognitive flexibility in entrepreneurial opportunity recognition. Management, 29, 62-72.

    Mauer, R., Neergaard, H., & Linstad, A. K. (2009). Self-efficacy: Conditioning the entrepreneurial mindset Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind (pp. 233–257): Springer.

    Mauer, R., Neergaard, H., & Linstad, A. K. (2017). Self-efficacy: Conditioning the entrepreneurial mindset Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind (pp. 293–317): Springer

    McGee, J., Peterson, M., Mueller, S., & Sequeira, J. (2009). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: refining the measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965–988.

    McMullen, Z. , Plummer, L. &. Acs, Z. (2007). What is an entrepreneurial opportunity? Small Business Economics, 28, 273-283.

    Miao, C., Qian, S., & Ma, D. (2017). The relationship between entrepreneurial self-efficacy and firm performance: a meta-analysis of main and moderator effects. Journal of Small Business Management, 55(1), 87-107.

    Moriano, J. A.; Palací, F. J. & Morales, J. F. (2006). Adaptación y validación en España de la escala de autoeficacia emprendedora. Revista de Psicología Social, 21(1), 51-64.

    Morin, E., Ciurana, E. R., & Motta, R. D. (2002). Educar en la era planetaria: el pensamiento complejo como método de aprendizaje en el error y la incertidumbre humana [Educating in the planetary age: complex thinking as a method of learning in human error and uncertainty]. Salamanca: Universidad de Valladolid.

    Muyan-Yılık, M., & Demir, A. (2019). A pathway towards subjective well-being for Turkish university students: the roles of dispositional hope, cognitive flexibility, and coping strategies. Journal of Happiness Studies. 12(1), 334-352.

    Nicolaou, N., Shane, S., Cherkas, L., & Spector, T. (2009). Opportunity recognition and the tendency to be an entrepreneur: a bivariate genetics perspective, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 108–117.

    Obschonka, M. , Hahn, E., Bajwa, N., (2018). Personal agency in newly arrived refugees: the role of personality, entrepreneurial cognitions and intentions, and career adaptability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 105, 173-184.

    Oshiro, K., Nagaoka, S., & Shimizu, E. (2016). Development and validation of the Japanese version of cognitive flexibility scale. BMC Research Notes. 34(28), 345-359.

    Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1997). The end of certainty. Simon and Schuster.

    Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Ragin, C. C. (2006). Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage. Political Analysis 14(3):291-310.

    Reis, E. (1997). Estatística multivariada. Lisboa: Edições Silabo Ltda.

    Ribeiro, T. M., & Teixeira, R. M. (2012). A criação de negócios por empreendedores jovens: estudo de casos múltiplos no Estado de Sergipe. Revista de Empreendedorismo e Gestão de Pequenas Empresas, 1(1), 72-100.

    Roshani, F., Piri, R., Malek, A., Michel, T. M., & Vafaee, M. S. (2019). Comparison of cognitive flexibility, appropriate risk-taking and reaction time in individuals with and without adult ADHD. Psychiatry Research. 32(12), 567-581.

    Salanova, M.; Grau, R.; Llorens, S. & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). Exposición a las tecnologías de la información, burnout y engagement: el rol modulador de la autoeficacia profesional. Psicología Social Aplicada, 11(1), 69-89.

    Sanchez, J., & Hernández-Sánchez, B. (2013). Gender, personal traits, and entrepreneurial intentions. Business and Management Research. 3(10), 456-479.

    Schneider, C., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets: agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comparative Sociology. 9(2), 376-396.

    Segal, G., Borgia, D. & Schoenfeld, J. (2002). Using social cognitive career theory to predict self-employment goals. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 47-56.

    Shepherd, D. A. & Krueger, N. F., Jr. (2002). An intentions-based model of entrepreneurial teams’ social cognition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(2), 167-185.

    Silva Filho, S. D., & Lizote, S. A. (2019). Autoeficácia e orientação empreendedora: uma análise de suas relações em pequenas empresas de moda íntima. Revista da Micro e Pequena Empresa, 13(1), 78-103.

    Simões, A. M. P. (2016). Autoeficácia empreendedora no ensino superior: o caso dos estudantes do Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra. Dissertação (Mestrado em Comunicação Organizacional: Cidadania, Confiança e Responsabilidade Social). Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra.

    Smith, B., Matthews, C. & Schenkel, M. (2009). Differences in entrepreneurial opportunities: the role of tacitness and codification in opportunity identification, Journal of Small Business Management, 47(1), 38-57.

    Spiro, R., & Jehng, J. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In Don Nix & R. Spiro (Eds) Cognitions, education, and multimedia: exploring ideas in high technology (162-205). Hillsdale, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Spiro, R., Vispael, W, Schimtz, J. Samarapungavam, M., & Boerger, (1987). Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer complex content domains. In B. Britton & S. Glynn (Eds). Executive Central in Process in Reading (pp. 177-199). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Sternberg, R. (2004). Successful intelligence as a basis for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing , 19(2), 0–201.

    Sung, E., Chang, J. H., Lee, S., & Park, S. H. (2019). The moderating effect of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between work stress and psychological symptoms in Korean air force pilots. Military Psychology, 31(2), 100-106.

    Thiem, A., & Dusa, A. (2012). Introducing the QCA Package: a market analysis and software review. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research. 10 (2), 45-9.

    Thiem, A., & Dusa, A. (2013). QCA: a package for Qualitative Comparative Analysis. The R Journal. 5(87), 345-367.

    Tolentino, L., Sedoglavich, V., Lu, V.; Garcia, P. & Restubog, S. (2014). The role of career adaptability in predicting entrepreneurial intentions: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 403–412. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2014.09.002.

    Treffers, T., Welpe, I. M., Spörrle, M., & Picot, A. O. (2017). The role of emotions and cognitions in the pre-entrepreneurial process: what's new? Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Mind (pp. 243–259), Springer.

    Turan-Ozpolat, E. (2020). Prediction of entrepreneurship of pre-service teachers based on cognitive flexibility and self-efficacy belief. educational policy analysis and strategic research, Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 15(2), 239-258.

    Vignochi, L., Lezana, A. G. R., & Paines, P. A. (2020). associações entre estilos cognitivos, flexibilidade e perfil de liderança empreendedora de universitários. Revista Alcance, 27(3), 276-292.

    Ward, T.(2004). Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 0–188.

    Welsh, D., Tullar, W., & Nemati, H. (2016). Entrepreneurship education: process, method, or both? Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 12(2), 345-379.

    World Economic Forum (2009). Educating the next wave of entrepreneurs: unlocking entrepreneurial capabilities to meet the global challenges of the 21st century. Geneva: Switzerland: World Economic Forum.

    World Economic Forum (2016). Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum Annual Report. Capturado de http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf.

    Yu, Y., Yu, Y., & Lin, Y. (2019). Anxiety and depression aggravate impulsiveness: the mediating and moderating role of cognitive flexibility. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 12(1), 1-12.

    Zhao, H.; Seibert, S. & Hills, G. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272.

    Zhoua, X., Mengb , Y., Schmitta, H., Montaga, C., Kendricka, K., & Becker, B. (2020). Cognitive flexibility mediates the association between early life stress and habitual behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 167, 1-8 110231

Revista Alcance

A Revista Alcance é uma revista brasileira de livre acesso, com publicação quadrimestral, vinculada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração e Programa de Mestrado Profissional em Administração - Gestão, Internacionalização e Logística da Universidade do Vale do Itajaí – Univali. Procuramos publicar artigos de trabalhos teóricos-empíricos e tecnológicos nas áreas da Administração. Diferentes perspectivas teóricas e metodológicas são bem-vindas, desde que sejam consistentes e relevantes para o desenvolvimento da área. 

Access journal