NAVEGANDO A DEMOCRACIA EM UMA PANDEMIA: O IMPACTO DA COVID-19 NO DEBATE PUBLICO E NOS PROCESSOS DEMOCRATICOS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v29n3.p866-899Palavras-chave:
COVID-19, Debate Público, Desinformação, Notícias falsas, Confiança Pública nas InstituiçõesResumo
Contextualização: Este estudo examina o impacto da pandemia de COVID-19 no discurso democrático em nove países europeus: Bulgária, Chipre, França, Itália, Grécia, Portugal, Eslovênia, Suécia e Espanha. A pesquisa foca em desafios-chave, como a tomada de decisões governamentais, transparência, confiança nas instituições, escrutínio do processo eleitoral e a influência da mídia e dos protestos sociais na formação do debate público. O estudo faz parte do projeto EU CERV HEARD.
Objetivos: O principal objetivo é investigar como a pandemia afetou o discurso democrático, com foco nas perspectivas de cidadãos europeus sub-representados. O estudo também explora a relação entre crises de saúde e desigualdades sociais, destacando a importância de medidas legais que protejam o engajamento democrático durante crises.
Metodologia: A Análise Temática Reflexiva (ATR) foi utilizada para analisar dados qualitativos de debates em painéis realizados em nove países entre abril e junho de 2023. Um total de 313 participantes contribuiu, e as discussões foram transcritas e codificadas sistematicamente para identificar temas-chave relacionados ao impacto da pandemia nos processos democráticos.
Resultados: Os resultados indicam que a pandemia impactou negativamente a democracia, com relatos de exploração do poder por políticos nacionais e um aumento da desinformação. O estudo também destaca como a pandemia agravou as desigualdades sociais, especialmente na participação democrática. No entanto, as conclusões são limitadas pela falta de diversidade entre os participantes, e pesquisas futuras devem incluir uma amostra mais ampla e avaliar os efeitos de longo prazo da pandemia na democracia.
Downloads
Referências
ALON, T. M. et al. The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020.
ASPLUND, E. et al. Elections and COVID-19: How election campaigns took place in 2020. International IDEA, 2 feb. 2021. Available at: https://www.idea.int/news/elections-and-covid-19-how-election-campaigns-took-place-2020. Accessed: 1 February 2024.
BALOVA, S. et al. Voting during pandemics: Making democracy resilient in turbulent times - Experiences from Central, South, and Eastern Europe. EPS Paper Series, mar. 2022. Available at: https://feps-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/220524-elections-observations-web.pdf. Accessed: 1 February 2024.
BARGAIN, O.; AMINJONOV, U. Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of Covid-19. SSRN, 2020.
BIDDELL, C. B. et al. Cross-sector decision landscape in response to COVID-19: A qualitative network mapping analysis of North Carolina decision-makers. Frontiers in Public Health, v. 10, 2022.
BOSANCIANU, C. M. et al. Political and social correlates of COVID-19 mortality. Perspectives on Politics, 2021. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/ub3zd. Accessed: 1 February 2024.
BRAUN, V.; CLARKE, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77-101, 2006.
BRAUN, V.; CLARKE, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77-101, 2006.
CAMPBELL, K. A. et al. Reflexive Thematic Analysis for Applied Qualitative Health Research. The Qualitative Report, v. 26, n. 6, p. 2011-2028, 2021.
CAMPBELL, R.; POUND, P.; MORGAN, M. et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: Systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative research. Health Technology Assessment, v. 15, n. 43, p. 6-7, 2021.
CORBIN, J.; STRAUSS, A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2014.
DARMANIN, J. Half of Europeans dissatisfied with EU pandemic management. Politico, 2021. Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/half-of-europeans-dissatisfied-with-eu-coronavirus-covid19-pandemic-management/. Accessed: 15 October 2023.
EIU. Covid-19 pandemic causes a global democracy slump. The Economist Intelligence Unit, 2 feb. 2021. Available at: https://www.eiu.com/n/covid-19-pandemic-causes-a-global-democracy-slump/. Accessed: 1 May 2024.
EL-JARDALI, F.; FADLALLAH, R.; DAHER, N. Multi-sectoral collaborations in selected countries of the Eastern Mediterranean region: Assessment, enablers and missed opportunities from the COVID-19 pandemic response. Health Research Policy and Systems, v. 22, p. 14, 2024.
FANCOURT, D.; STEPTOE, A.; WRIGHT, L. The Cummings effect: Politics, trust, and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet, v. 396, n. 10249, p. 464-465, 2020.
FERREIRA CACERES, M. M. et al. The impact of misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic. AIMS Public Health, v. 9, n. 2, p. 262-277, 2022.
FREEDOM HOUSE. NEW REPORT: Democracy under Lockdown - The Impact of COVID-19 on Global Freedom. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org/article/new-report-democracy-under-lockdown-impact-covid-19-global-freedom. Accessed: 19 February 2024.
GLASER, B. G. Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Sociology Press, 1992.
HERRE, B.; RODÉS-GUIRAO, L.; ORTIZ-OSPINA, E.; ROSER, M. Data Page: Democracy index, 2023. In: Democracy. Data adapted from Economist Intelligence Unit, Gapminder. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/democracy-index-eiu. Accessed: 1 May 2024.
HILBERT, M. The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy, v. 35, n. 8, p. 715-736, 2011.
HILHORST, D.; MENA, R. When Covid-19 meets conflict: Politics of the pandemic response in fragile and conflict-affected states. Disasters, v. 45, suppl. 1, p. S174-S194, 2021.
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR DEMOCRACY AND ELECTORAL ASSISTANCE (IDEA). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women in politics. 2022. Available at: https://www.idea.int/events/impact-covid-19-pandemic-women-politics. Accessed: 9 February 2024.
JAMES, T. S.; ALIHODZIC, S. When is it democratic to postpone an election? Elections during natural disasters, COVID-19, and emergency situations. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, v. 19, n. 3, 2020.
KING'S COLLEGE LONDON. The ongoing political consequences of the pandemic. 7 oct. 2022. Available at: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/news/the-ongoing-political-consequences-of-the-pandemic. Accessed: 1 February 2024.
KONIG, A. Expertise versus democracy: A false choice. Young Academy of Scotland, 16 October 2020. Available at: https://www.youngacademyofscotland.org.uk/expertise-versus-democracy-a-false-choice/. Accessed: 15 February 2024.
KORTUM, P. et al. How human factors can help preserve democracy in the age of pandemics. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, v. 62, n. 7, p. 1077–1086, 2020.
LEWKOWICZ, J.; WOŹNIAK, M.; WRZESIŃSKI, M. COVID-19 and erosion of democracy. Economic Modelling, v. 106, p. 105682, 2022.
MARIEN, S.; HOOGHE, M. Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, v. 50, n. 3, p. 267–291, 2011.
MERKEL, W. Is there a crisis of democracy? Democratic Theory, v. 1, n. 1, p. 11–25, 2014.
MOON, M. J. Fighting COVID-19 with agility, transparency, and participation: Wicked policy problems and new governance challenges. Public Administration Review, v. 80, n. 4, p. 651-656, 2020.
MUKHERJEE, S. et al. National and subnational governance and decision-making processes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria: An empirical analysis. BMJ Global Health, v. 8, e012965, 2023.
PAJNIK, M.; HRŽENJAK, M. The Intertwining of the Covid-19 Pandemic with Democracy Backlash: Making Sense of Journalism in Crisis. Journalism Practice, v. 18, n. 5, p. 1175–1192, 2022.
PENNYCOOK, G. et al. Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science, v. 31, n. 7, p. 770-780, 2020.
PRZEWORSKI, A. Crises of democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
ROBINSON, L. et al. Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, v. 18, n. 5, p. 569-582, 2015.
SMITH, J. A.; OSBORN, M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: SMITH, J. A. (Ed.). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage Publications, 2003. p. 51-80.
SORSA, V. P.; KIVIKOSKI, K. COVID-19 and democracy: A scoping review. BMC Public Health, v. 23, p. 1668, 2023.
SUTTON, J. et al. Population density and spreading of COVID-19 in England and Wales. PLOS ONE, 2022.
U.S. GLOBAL LEADERSHIP COALITION. COVID-19 Brief: Impact on Democracy Around the World. 2024. Available at: https://www.usglc.org/coronavirus/democracy/. Accessed: 1 May 2024.
UN WOMEN. Online and ICT-facilitated violence against women and girls during COVID-19. 2020. Available at: https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2020/04/brief-online-and-ict-facilitated-violence-against-women-and-girls-during-covid-19. Accessed: 9 July 2023.
UNDP. COVID-19 and the Crisis of Governance: The Impact of the Pandemic on Peace, Justice and Inclusion (SDG 16). Available at: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2022-07/COVID-19%20and%20the%20crisis%20of%20Governance.pdf. Accessed: 1 March 2024.
USGLC. COVID-19 Brief: Impact on Democracy Around the World. 2021. Available at: https://www.usglc.org/coronavirus/democracy/. Accessed: 23 October 2023.
WILLIAMS, A. Global cooperation: Why cross-sector collaboration is key to building more resilient communities. World Economic Forum, 10 January. 2024. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/01/collaboration-key-resilient-communities-davos/. Accessed: 15 February 2024.
WONG, D. W. S.; LI, Y. Spreading of COVID-19: Density matters. PLOS ONE, 2020.
WOOD, S. L. The right to protest during a pandemic: Using public health ethics to bridge the divide between public health goals and human rights. Bioethical Inquiry, v. 20, p. 169-176, 2023.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Na qualidade de autor(es) da colaboração, original e inédita, sobre o qual me(nos) responsabilizo(amos) civil e penalmente pelo seu conteúdo, após ter lido as diretrizes para autores, concordado(amos) plenamente com as Políticas Editorias da Revista Novos Estudos Jurídicos - NEJ e autorizo(amos) a publicação na rede mundial de computadores (Internet), permitindo, também, que sua linguagem possa ser reformulada, caso seja necessário, sem que me(nos) seja devido qualquer pagamento a título de direitos autorais, podendo qualquer interessado acessá-lo e/ou reproduzi-lo mediante download, desde que a reprodução e/ou publicação obedeçam as normas da ABNT e tenham a finalidade exclusiva de uso por quem a consulta a título de divulgação da produção acadêmico científico.