WEIGHTING PRINCIPLES IN CIVIL PROCEDURE AND THE GUARANTEE OF PROTECTION TO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS RELATED TO THE EXISTENTIAL MINIMUM

Bruno Smolarek Dias; Lucas Augusto Gaioski Pagani; João Marcos Lisbôa Feliciano

doi:10.14210/rdp.v18n1.p157-175

Authors

Bruno Smolarek Dias Universidade Paranaense - UNIPAR https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-7025
Lucas Augusto Gaioski Pagani Universidade Paranaense - UNIPAR https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9396-9133
João Marcos Lisbôa Feliciano Universidade Paranaense – UNIPAR https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4370-5265

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14210/rdp.v18n1.p157-175

Keywords:

Civil Procedure, Weighting of principles, Fundamental rights, Existential Minimum

Abstract

Objectives: This article aims to examine and study the normative provisions concerning the weighting of principles in Civil Procedural Law aiming at the guarantee and protection of Fundamental Rights concerning the existential minimum. With the innovations brought by the Civil Procedure Code of 2015, in which the legislator sought to write it in the light of the precepts of the normative Federal Constitution of 1988, there was a clear constitutional influence on civil procedural provisions, making the Courts of Justice and their magistrates, in the exercise of their attributions, to perform obligations and responsibilities different from those performed until then.

Methodology: For that, it uses bibliographic-documentary analysis, from the deductive method, to infer the conclusions. It examines, therefore, the attributions of the Judiciary, which from applying the laws, passes in its attributions and decisions to observe the legal system as a whole, through a normative and principled analysis, recognizing new rights and effectively putting into practice fundamental rights with direct foundation in the constitutional text.

Results: It is concluded that in the normative absence or in the conflict of norms, especially in the figure of the principles, when providing the effective application of Fundamental Rights, under the goal of ensuring and promoting minimum material conditions for human survival, this will take place under the prism of balancing constitutional principles, such as the Existential Minimum, influencing this weighting not in the dimension of the validity of the principles, but in their weight in concrete cases, which tend to lean towards the protection of the dignity of the human person as a vector of fundamental rights and foundation of the Republic.

Author Biographies

Bruno Smolarek Dias, Universidade Paranaense - UNIPAR

Graduated in Law from Centro Universitário Positivo (2004) and Master in Law from the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (2008). Doctor in Legal Science at the University of Vale do Itajaí - SC (2014), former CAPES scholarship holder for Doctorate at the University of Minho - Portugal (2012). Doctorate with the Universitá degli Studi di Perugia - Italy. Worked as Coordinator of the Law Course at Universidade Paranaense - Unipar Campus Francisco Beltrão (2010-2014), full professor at Universidade Paranaense and temporary at the State University of Western Paraná - UNIOESTE. Teaches at undergraduate, graduate and Master's degrees in Procedural Law and Citizenship at Universidade Paranaense (UNIPAR). E-mail: professorbruno@prof.unipar.br.

Lucas Augusto Gaioski Pagani, Universidade Paranaense - UNIPAR

Master in Procedural Law and Citizenship (UNIPAR). Graduated in Law from Universidade Paranaense (UNIPAR). PIT/UNIPAR Scholarship. Mises Alumni. Acton Alumni. Professor of lato sensu postgraduate studies in Law, Political Science and Liberalism at the Mises Academy (UniÍtalo). Professor of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Studies in Law at Universidade Paranaense (UNIPAR), Umuarama campus. Judge Adviser (TJPR). E-mail: lucas.pagani@prof.unipar.br.

João Marcos Lisbôa Feliciano, Universidade Paranaense – UNIPAR

Master's student in Procedural Law and Citizenship at Universidade Paranaense – UNIPAR. Postgraduate in Advanced Public Law Practice by Damásio Educacional. Postgraduate in Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure from the University Center of Fundação Assis Gurgacz – FAG. Bachelor of Laws from the University Center of the Assis Gurgacz Foundation – FAG. Lawyer and City Attorney. E-mail: joaomarcos-adv@outlook.com

References

ALEXY, Robert. Teoria dos direitos fundamentais. Tradução Virgílio Afonso da Silva. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2008.

ALEXY, Robert. Teoria dos direitos fundamentais. 2. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2011.

BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Celso Antônio. Discricionariedade e controle jurisdicional. São Paulo: Malheiros. 2. ed., 9 tir. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2010.

BARCELLOS, Ana Paula de. A eficácia jurídica dos princípios constitucionais: o princípio da dignidade da pessoa humana. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2002.

DANTAS, David Diniz. Interpretação constitucional no pós-positivismo: teoria e casos práticos. São Paulo: WVC, 2004.

DIAS, Bruno Smolerek. SOUZA, Leonardo Fratini Xavier de. SIMAS, Silvonei. A Efetivação do Direito Fundamental à Saúde por meio de Decisões do Poder Judiciário no Estado Contemporâneo. Revista Brasileira de Direitos e Garantias Fundamentais. V.6, n.2, p. 01-21, Jul/Dez. 2020, Available in: <http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0111/2020.v6i2.6978>, Accesses in: 14 de june 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0111/2020.v6i2.6978

DWORKIN, Ronald. Levando os direitos a sério. 2. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2007.

FERRAZ JÚNIOR, Tércio Sampaio. Direito Constitucional. São Paulo: Manole, 2007.

FRANCISCO, José Carlos. Função regulamentar e regulamentos. São Paulo: Forense, 2009.

MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme; ARENHART, Sérgio Cruz; MITIDIERO, Daniel. Curso de Processo Civil. v.1. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais. 3. ed. rev. atual. E-book. 2017.

MARTINS, Ricardo Marcondes. Efeitos dos vícios do ato administrativo. 1ª ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2008.

MARTINS, Ricardo Marcondes. Estudos de Direito Administrativo neoconstitucional. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2015.

MARTINS, Ricardo Marcondes. Teoria dos princípios formais. Interesse público-IP: Belo Horizonte, ano 18, nº 98, julho – agosto, 2016.

MARTINS, Ricardo Marcondes. Proporcionalidade e boa administração. In: CAMMAROSANO, Flávia; ESTEFAM, Felipe Faiwichow. Direito Público em debate. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2014.

MEDINA, José Miguel Garcia. Curso de Direito Processual Civil Moderno, 5. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2020.

NEVES, Daniel Amorim Assumpção. Novo Código de Processo Civil – Lei 13.105/2015 – Inovações, Alterações, Supressões Comentadas. Rio de Janeiro: Forense; São Paulo: Método, 2015.

PIRES, Luis Manuel Fonseca. Controle judicial da discricionariedade administrativa: dos conceitos jurídicos indeterminados às políticas públicas. 2. ed., Belo Horizonte: Fórum, 2007.

SANTOS, Achibaldo Nunes dos Santos. DIAS, Bruno Smolerek. DE PAULA, Jônatas Luiz Moreira. A diferença ontológica entre o devido processo legal, o contraditório e a ampla defesa sob o enfoque da Constituição Federal e das leis da República Brasileira. Research, Society and Development, v. 10, n. 15, nov. 2021, Available in:< http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i15.23090> Accesses in: 15 june 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i15.23090

SARLET, Ingo Wolfgang. A Eficácia dos Direitos Fundamentais: uma Teoria Geral dos Direitos Fundamentais na perspectiva constitucional. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2012.

SILVA, Virgílio Afonso da. Direitos fundamentais: conteúdo essencial, restrições e eficácia, 2ª ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2010.