CHI RAPPRESENTA LA NATURA? UNA RIFLESSIONE COMPARATIVA TRA DIRITTI E PERSONALITÀ DEGLI ECOSISTEMI

Jacopo Paffarini

doi:10.14210/nej.v30n3.p316-333

Authors

Jacopo Paffarini Università degli Studi di Perugia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1078-8017

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v30n3.p316-333

Keywords:

Legal personality of nature, Ecological guardianship, Environmen-tal democracy, Rights of nature, Participatory democracy

Abstract

Contextualization: The article examines the emerging trend of recognizing legal personality for nature, highlighting the implications of two ecosystem guardianship models: "public" or "diffuse" guardianship, and guardianship exercised by specific councils, whether elected or appointed.

Objectives: To examine the extent to which guardianship models promote a transition from an anthropocentric paradigm toward ecocentric considerations. It also aims to reflect on the role of social conflicts in shaping these models and their implications for designing protection instruments.

Method: The study is based on a comparative analysis of relevant legislation and ju-risprudence in water governance (e.g., Río Atrato, Whanganui, Mar Menor, Laguna Francia).

Results: The recognition of nature's rights constitutes both a response to the failure of traditional protections and a powerful democratic innovation capable of restructuring the public sphere by overcoming the vertical dynamic typical of the Westphalian state and classical international law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jacopo Paffarini, Università degli Studi di Perugia

Ricercatore di diritto pubblico comparato presso l’Università degli Studi di Perugia. Professore del Dottorato in “Direito, Democracia e Tecnologia” presso l’Atitus Educação di Passo Fundo/RS (Brasile). Currículo Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/2741900219071256.

References

AMIRANTE, Domenico. Costituzionalismo ambientale: Atlante giuridico per l’Antropocene. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2022.

ANGELINI, Cristiana. The climate change case law of the European Court of Human Rights: vulnerability and victim status. In: CARTA, Maria Cristina; VEZZANI, Simone (org.). International and European Union Law in the Face of Climate Change. Torino: Giappichelli, p. 23-46, 2024.

ARGENTINA. Tribunal Distrital de Resistencia. Caso Vecinos del Barrio Villa Altabe c/ Municipalidad de Resistencia et al. Nº 4085/2019-1-C. 2021.

BAGNI, Silvia; AMIRANTE, Domenico (org.). Environmental Constitutionalism in Anthropocene: Values, Principles and Actions. Oxford-New York: Routledge, 2022.

BAGNI, Silvia. Diritti della natura nei nuovi costituzionalismi del Global South: riflessi sulla teoria dei formanti. DPCEonline, n. esp. 2, p. 153-184, 2023.

BOOKCHIN, Murray. Dall’urbanizzazione alle città. Milano: Eleuthera, 2023.

BOOKCHIN, Murray. L’ecologia della libertà. Milano: Eleuthera, 2020.

BOURGEOIS-GIRONDE, Sacha. Les droits de la nature, un changement de paradigme? In: GEFEN, Alexandre (org.). Un monde commun: Les savoirs des sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: CNRS Éditions, p. 127-140, 2023.

BOURGEOIS-GIRONDE, Sacha. Nature in the law: An evolution from environmental law to legal ecocentrism. In: ZALUSKI, Wojciech; BOURGEOIS-GIRONDE, Sacha; DYRDA, Adam (org.). Research Handbook on Legal Evolution. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803921822.00026. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2025.

BROWN-WEISS, Edith. Rule of Law for Nature in a kaleidoscopic world. In: VOIGT, Christina (org.). Rule of Law for Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 27-38, 2013.

BRUNET, Pierre. Diritto, credenze e natura: verso un’ontologia giuridica animista? In: COCO, Emanuele (org.). L’invenzione della realtà. Scienza, mito e immaginario nel dialogo tra psiche e mondo oggettivo: Una prospettiva filosofica. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, p. 426-439, 2022.

CAMBRA GONZÁLEZ, Antonio. Can co-op supermarkets lead the way to sustainability? Potentials and challenges in the shift from food difference to food democracy in Spain. International Journal of Cultural Studies, v. 28, n. 3, p. 702-722, jan. 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779241306442. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2025.

CARDUCCI, Michele. È (im)possibile la repubblica dei beni comuni? Da Kouroukanfouga alle autogestioni locali e ritorno. H-ermes Journal of Communication, v. 11, p. 41-62, 2018.

CERDÀ, Paco. Natural Disaster Destroyed Part of València. Populism May Take Us All the Way Down. The New York Times, 7 nov. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/07/opinion/spain-floods-valencia-populism.html. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2025.

COLÔMBIA. Corte Constitucional. Sentencia T-622/2016. 2016.

CORREA VALERO, Diana Magalí; STAFFEN, Marcio Ricardo; BODNAR, Zenildo. Access to Climate Justice from a Transnational Perspective. Beijing Law Review, v. 14, p. 1162-1182, 2023.

CORTE EUROPEIA DOS DIREITOS DO HOMEM. Caso Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz e outros v. Suíça. Julgamento de 9 de abril de 2024. Disponível em: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2025.

DE SALLES CAVEDON-CAPDEVILLE, Fernanda et al. An Ecocentric Perspective on Climate Litigation: Lessons from Latin America. Journal of Human Rights Practice, v. 16, n. 1, p. 89-106, 2024.

DELL’OMARINO, Martina. La funzione democratica della partecipazione al procedimento: alcune considerazioni a partire dalle recenti riforme in materia di dibattito pubblico. Federalismi.it, n. 11, p. 01-23, 2024.

DESCOLA, Philippe. Oltre Natura e Cultura. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2021.

DUPY, Jean Pierre. Pour un catastrophisme éclairé. Paris: Seuil, 2002.

ESPANHA. Ley Orgánica 19/2022, de 30 de septiembre, para el reconocimiento de personalidad jurídica a la laguna del Mar Menor y su cuenca. 2022.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Santa Monica, California. Santa Monica Municipal Code, § 4.75. 2013.

ESTADOS UNIDOS. Toledo, Ohio. Lake Erie Bill of Rights (LEBOR). 2019.

FALKENBERG, Max et al. Patterns of partisan toxicity and engagement reveal the common structure of online political communication across countries. Nature Communications, v. 15, n. 9560, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53868-0. Disponível em: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-53868-0. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2025.

GALVEZ-HERNANDEZ, Pablo; DAI, Yining; MUNTANER, Carles. The DANA disaster: unraveling the political and economic determinants for Valencia’s floods devastation. International Journal for Equity in Health, v. 24, n. 64, 2025.

GALLARATI, Francesco. L’obbligazione climatica davanti alla Corte europea dei diritti dell’uomo: la sentenza KlimaSeniorinnen e le sue ricadute comparate. DPCEonline, v. 2, p. 1457-1478, 2024.

GARCIA, Helena Alviar. Granting Rights to Rivers in the Shadow of Extractivism. FIU Law Review, v. 18, p. 687-722, 2024.

HERMITTE, Marie-Angèle. Artificialisation de la nature et droit(s) du vivant. In: DESCOLA, Philippe (org.). Les natures en question. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2018. p. 257-284.

KAHUI, Viktoria; ARMSTRONG, Claire W.; AANESEN, Margrethe. Comparative analysis of Rights of Nature case studies worldwide: Feature of emergence and design. Ecological Economics, v. 221, p. 108-193, 2024.

KAUFFMAN, Creig M. Guardianship Arrangement in Rights of Nature Legal Provisions. In: ZELLE, Anthony R. et al. (org.). Earth Law: Emerging Ecocentric Law - A Guide for Practitioners. New York: Aspen, 2021, p. 145-162.

KOTARI, Ashish et al. Pluriverso: Dizionario del Post-sviluppo. Salerno: Orthotes, 2022.

LEONE, Carmela. Modelli partecipativi nella gestione delle risorse idriche: Italia e Brasile a confronto. DPCEonline, n. 3, p. 1037-1050, 2025.

LOWENHAUPT TSING, Anna. Il fungo alla fine del mondo. La possibilità di vivere nelle rovine del capitalismo. Trento: Keller, 2021.

MACPHERSON, Elizabeth. Can Western water law become more ‘relational’? A survey of comparative laws affecting water across Australasia and the Americas. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, v. 53, n. 3, p. 395-424, 2023. DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2022.2143383. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03036758.2022.2143383. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2025.

MACPHERSON, Elizabeth. The (Human) Rights of Nature: A Comparative Study of Emerging Legal Rights of Rivers and Lakes in the United States of America and Mexico. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum, v. 31, p. 327-377, 2021.

MARQUARDT, Bernd. Historia de la sostenibilidad. Historia Crítica, n. 32, p. 172-197, 2006.

MELNYK, Anna et al. Value dynamics in energy democracy: An exploration of community energy initiatives. Energy Research & Social Science, v. 102, p. 01-13, 2023.

MÉXICO. Estado de Colima. Constitución Política. Art. 2 bis. 2019.

MÉXICO. Estado de Oaxaca. Constitución Política. Art. 16. 2021.

MÉXICO. Estado de México. Constitución Política. Art. 5. 2024.

MORAES, Alexandre. Democracia e Redes Sociais: Desafio de Combater o Populismo Digital Extremista. Brasília: Atlas, 2024.

MUNOZ AVILA, Lina. Enfoques para el abordaje de la conflictividad ambiental en América Latina: la propuesta del Acuerdo de Escazú sobre democracia ambiental. In: RESTREPO MEDINA, Manuel Alberto (org.). Interculturalidad, protección de la naturaleza y construcción de paz. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario Editora, 2020. p. 209-234.

NICOLINI, Matteo. Diritto sommerso. In: BAGNI, Silvia et al (org.). Interculturalismo Lessico comparato. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica, 2024, p. 241-256.

NOVA ZELÂNDIA. Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017. 2017.

OST, François. Le droit constitutionnel de l’environnement: un changement de paradigme? In: COHENDET, Marie-Anne (org.). Droit constitutionnel de l’environnement. Paris: Mare & Martin, 2021. p. 405-438.

PAFFARINI, Jacopo. I diritti della Laguna Francia e la guardianship degli ecosistemi acquatici nel caso Vecinos del Barrio Villa Altabe c. Municipalidad de Resistencia et al. Osservatorio sul Costituzionalismo ambientale, DPCE Online, 07 mar. 2025. Disponível em: https://www.dpceonline.it/. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2025.

PELIZZON, Alessandro. Ecological Jurisprudence: The Law of Nature and the Nature of Law. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2024. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-96-0173-8. Acesso em: 26 mar. 2025.

PETRILLO, Pier Luigi. Teorie e tecniche del lobbying. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2019.

PETROVICS, Daniel et al. Diverse scaling strategies of energy communities: A comparative case study analysis of varied governance contexts. Earth System Governance, v. 19, 2024.

PIERINI, Andrea. L’unione bancaria europea come federalizing process: Una prospettiva di diritto comparato. Milano: Wolters Kluwer, 2019.

QUADRI, Susanna. La componente “inclusiva” dello sviluppo sostenibile nella nuova governance europea dell’energia: le comunità energetiche. Diritto e Società, n. 4, p. 675-690, 2022.

SCARCIGLIA, Roberto. Spagna. Rivista italiana di diritto costituzionale, v. 1, p. 264-266, 2025.

THOMPSON, Matthew. What’s so new about New Municipalism? Progress in Human Geography, v. 45, n. 2, p. 317–342, 2021.