CHINA AT THE CROSSROAD: HOW CHINA IS TURNING THE CORNER ON INNOVATION

Stacy Scott

doi:10.14210/nej.v28n3.p668-685

Authors

Stacy Scott Boston University, Boston, United States of America https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-6399

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v28n3.p668-685

Keywords:

China, Innovation, Public education

Abstract

Contextualization: This article examines China's drive toward innovation in public education, suggesting that the country is determined to transform its educational system into one that fosters creativity as a norm and makes innovation a consistent, prioritized outcome. Changes in educational practices will only occur if the idea is consistent and has clear value for parents, business leaders, and educators. The Chinese leadership is clearly focused on making this change happen.

Objective: The purpose of the article is to discuss several key elements that can facilitate the path to institutionalizing innovation within China's educational system. This includes the possibility of China monetizing innovation by becoming a leader in the global battle for new design patents, which would justify substantial investments in the future transformation of its educational system, from kindergarten through to postgraduate education.

Methodology: This is exploratory research that uses the inductive method and employs a literature review as the technique for data collection.

Results: The article suggests that, with adequate support and guidance, China is ready to take on the challenge of fostering innovation in a short period of time. This depends on a series of decisions about how space is used, how teachers are assigned, trained, and supported, and the concepts and pedagogy that drive learning. Supporting teachers in building and managing new structures that foster innovation is essential for changing the structure of schools and teaching, teaching students to become more creative, which is crucial for China's future economy

Author Biography

Stacy Scott, Boston University, Boston, United States of America

Senior lecturer in educational leadership & policy studies at Boston University Wheelock College of Education & Human DevelopmentEdD, Harvard Graduate School of Education; EdM, Harvard Graduate School of Education; BA, Harvard College.

References

BAIDU COMPANY. Chinese internet learning white paper. The Chinese Journal of ICT in Education, v. 16, n. Suppl, p. 48–49, 2015.

COTTER, K. N.; PRETZ, J. E.; KAUFMAN, J. C. Applicant Extracurricular Involvement Predicts Creativity Better Than Traditional Admissions Factors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, v. 24, p. 250-267, 2015. DOI: 10.1037/A0039831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e549472014-001

DACEY, J. S.; LENNON, K. H. Understanding creativity: The interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998. p. 69.

DELLO-IACOVO, Belinda. Curriculum Reform and "Quality Education" in China: An Overview. International Journal of Educational Development, v. 29, n. 3, p. 241-249, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.02.008

GAJDA, A.; BEGHETTO, R. A.; KARWOWSKI, M. Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, v. 24, p. 250-267, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.002

HUANG, F. Building the world-class research universities: A case study of China. Higher Education, v. 70, n. 2, p. 203–215, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9876-8

JIANG, Zhaochen. Literacy teaching by rhyming text. International Conference of Chinese Education, p. 272–280, 2002.

KELLOGG, R. P. China’s brain gain? Attitudes and future plans of overseas. Journal of Chinese Overseas, v. 8, n. 1, p. 83–104, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/179325412X634319

LAI, M.; LO, L. N. K. Struggling to balance various stakeholders’ perceptions: The work life of ideo-political education teachers in China. Higher Education, v. 62, n. 3, p. 333–349, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9391-x

LI, D.; REMEDIOS, L.; CLARKE, D. Chinese students’ groupwork practices and experiences in China. Higher Education, v. 68, n. 2, p. 227–241, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9704-y

LOVELESS, T. Lessons from the PISA-Shanghai controversy. Washington, DD: Brookings Institution, Brown Center on Education Policy, 2014.

LUNDVALL, B.A. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers, 1992.

MASHKINA, O. A. China: prospects for innovation and education. História e Modernidade, n. 2, p. 144–158, 2010.

MINISTRY OF EDUCATION OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA (MOE). Jiaoyubu bangongting guanyu tuijin shishi gaoxiao sixiang zhengzhi lilunke tepin jiaoshou zhidu de tongzhi. 2016. Disponível em: <http://www.moe.edu.cn/srcsite/A13/moe_772/201604/t20160412_237724.html>. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2024.

MOK, K.-H. Globalization and educational restructuring: University merging and changing governance in China. Higher Education, v. 50, n. 1, p. 57-88, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25068089. R DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6347-z

OECD. PISA 2012 results. Creative problem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems. Paris: OECD, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264208070-en

REN, Y. Q.; LU, B. R. The top-level design of ICT in education during the thirteenth five-year plan. e-Education Research, v. 36, n. 6, p. 5–14, 2015.

SNEDDON, Michael. Visões Internas: Uma olhada no enorme aumento nos depósitos de patentes na China. Intellectual Property Watch, 22 abr. 2015.

STEVENSON, Harold W.; STIGLER, James W. The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit Books, 1992

TAUBMAN-REZAKHANLOU, Jahan Harry. hina Continues High Growth in IO Filings, But is There More To The Story. Intellectual Property Watch, 04 fev. 2016.

ZHAO, Yong. Aprendizes de classe mundial: Educando estudantes criativos e empreendedores. Thousand Oaks: Corwin, 2012.