INNOVATIVE INTEGRITY PACTS IN SPAIN: ENHANCING PUBLIC SECTOR ANTI-CORRUPTION LAWS AND PRACTICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14210/nej.v30n3.p285-315Keywords:
Corruption, Integrity pacts, Public procurement, Spain, TransparencyAbstract
Contextualization: The detriments stemming from improper practices in public procurement, encompassing illicit acts such as bribery, illegal commissions, collusion, fraud, facilitation of payments, or manipulation of bidding processes, represent a complex challenge that necessitates a collaborative response from multiple stakeholders. Integrity Pacts emerge as an innovative solution with substantial potential in this context, posing both a challenge and a complement to law and public policy formulation and implementation.
Objectives: The objective of this research is to present the knowledge gained from the experience of four pilot integrity pacts implemented in Spain between April 2017 and January 2019.
Method: The structure of this text follows the following scheme: first, a literature review on the extent and advantages of Integrity Pacts (IPs) as a collective action tool against corruption in public procurement is conducted. Subsequently, the relationship between corruption and public procurement in the context of Spain is analyzed. Next, a detailed comparison of the implementation process of the four IPs in Spain is carried out. Finally, the conclusions offer key ideas and practical advice on the path to sustainable change beyond the impacts.
Results: This paper presents the results of Spain's four Integrity Pacts, highlighting the collaboration between civil society, government, and businesses to enhance decision-making processes In its conclusions, this paper presents key ideas and practical tips for assessing and improving the impact of Integrity Pacts, particularly with a view to achieving lasting change.
Downloads
References
ARRIBAS REYES, Esteban. Acción Colectiva, corrupción e integridad en la contratación pública: la experiencia española de implementación de los pactos de integridad como complemento al derecho y las políticas públicas anticorrupción. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, n. 65, p. ene. 2024.
ARRIBAS REYES, Esteban. Pactos de integridad. EUNOMÍA - Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, n. 17, p. 328-348, Sep. 2019. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2019.5037. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
BAUHR, Monika; NASIRITOUSI, Naghmeh. Does corruption cause aid fatigue? QoG Working Paper Series, University of Gothenburg, v. 17, p. 02-20, Dec. 2011. Retrieved from: https://x.gd/WGcb7. Acess: Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
BAUHR, Monika; NASIRITOUSI, Naghmeh. Why pay bribes? Collective action and anticorruption efforts. QoG Working Paper Series, University of Gothenburg, v. 18, p. 02-23, Dec.2011. Retrieved from: https://x.gd/0mM5m. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
CIS – Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. Delivery of 3398 Barometer for March 2023. Madrid: CIS, Mar. 2023. Retrieved from: https://www.cis.es/en/-/entrega-del-3398-barometro-de-marzo-2023. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
CNMC - Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Competencia. Memoria 2015. Espanha: CNMC, 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.cnmc.es/file/172251/download. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
CORRETJA TORRENS, Mercè. The most significant changes to Public Procurement for Spain`s Local Councils. Revista Catalana de dret public, vol. 57, p.17-31, Dec. 2018. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2436/rcdp.i57.2018.3163. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
ESPANHA. Act 19/2013, of 9 December, on Transparency, Access to Public Information, and Good Governance. Portal de la Transparencia: Espanha, 08 nov. 2013. Retrieved from: https://www.hacienda.gob.es/Documentacion/Publico/AdministracionElectronica/Act-19-2013_on_transparency_access_to_public_information_and_good_governance.pdf. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
ESPANHA. Ley 9/2017, de 8 de noviembre, de Contratos del Sector Público, por la que se transponen al ordenamento Jurídico español las Directivas del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo 2014/23/UE y 2014/24/UE, de 26 de febrero de 2014. Boletín Oficial des Estado: n. 272, Espanha, 09 nov. 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2017/11/08/9/con. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Integrity Pacts - in the context of the latest trends in área of PP and anti-corruption. Valencia: European Commission, 2018. Retrieved from: https://x.gd/aiVxT. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
EUROPEAN UNION. Directives 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014, on the award of concession contract (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union, European Union, L 94, 28 mar. 2014. Retrieved from: https://x.gd/yVJUZ. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
FAZEKAS, Mihály; CINGOLANI, Luciana; TÓTH, Bence. Innovations in Objectively Measuring Corruption in Public Procurement. In: A. Helmut, M. Haber; M.A. Kayser (Eds.). Governance Indicators: Approaches, Progress, Promise. Inglaterra: Oxford University Press, 2018, p. 154–185. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198817062.003.0007. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
FAZEKAS, Mihály; KOCSIS, Gabor. Uncovering High-Level Corruption: Cross-National Objective Corruption Risk Indicators Using Public Procurement Data. British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50, n. 1, p. 155–164, Jan. 2020. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000461. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
FAZEKAS, Mihály; TOTH, István Janos; KING, Lawrence Peter. An Objective Corruption Risk Index Using Public Procurement Data. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, vol. 22, n. 3, p.369–397, Apr. 2016. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9308-z. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
OBSERVATORIO DE CONTRATACIÓN PÚBLICA. Propuesta de modificaciones y mejora al Proyecto de Ley de Contratos del Sector Público, por el que se transponen al ordenamiento jurídico español las Directivas del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, 2014/23/UE y 2014/24/UE, de 26 de febrero de 2014 (Publicado en el Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales, Congreso de los Diputados 2 de diciembre de 2016). Espanha, 2017. Retrieved from: https://x.gd/q2Hfw. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
UNITED NATIONS. Global Sustainable Development Report 2023. Nova York: United Nations, 2023. Retrieved from: https://x.gd/K617pI. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
HECLO, Hugh. Thinking Institutionally. Ed. Estado y Sociedad. Madrid: Paidós, 2010.
JANDL, Michael. Towards the monitoring of Goal 16 of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). A study of the selection, rationale and validity of indicators with suggestions for further improvements. Kriminologisches Repository, Helsinki, n. 86, p. 01-130, 2017. Helsinki, 2017. Retrieved from: https://publikationen.uni-tuebingen.de/xmlui/handle/10900/82975. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
JIMÉNEZ ASENSIO, Rafael. Cómo prevenir la Corrupción: Integridad y Transparencia. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata, 2017.
LAMBSDORFF, Johann Graf. Making Corrupt Deals: Contracting in the Shadow of the Law. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 48, n. 3, p. 221–241, Jul. 2002. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00217-7. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
MADRID. Survey of Quality of Life 2017. Madrid: SAMUR Protección Civil, 2017. Retrieved from: https://x.gd/jpxTb. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
MADRID. City of Madrid OGP Action Plan 2017. Madrid: Portal de Transparencia, 2017. Retrieved from: https://x.gd/Q9AA3. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
MARQUETTE, Heather; PEIFFER, Caryn. Corruption and Collective Action. Research Paper 32. Birmingham: The Developmental Leadership Program (DLP), International Development Department, School of Government and Society, College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.u4.no/publications/corruption-and-collective-action.pdf. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
MINGIU-PIPPIDI, Alina. Contextual Choices in Fighting Corruption: Lessons Learned Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, Noruega, p. 01-157, Jul. 2011. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2042021. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
MIRANZO DÍAZ, Javier. The Necessary Paradigm Shift in Approaching Corruption in European Public Procurement: Proposals for Systematization. Revista General de Derecho Administrativo, Madrid/Spain, v. 51. p. 01-44, May. 2019. Retrieved from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3556964. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
NIELSEN, Richard P. Corruption Networks and Implications for Ethical Corruption Reform. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 42, n. 2 p.125-149, Jan. 2003. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1021969204875.pdf. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Recommendation of the Council on Public Integrity. OECD, 2017. Retrieved from: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0435. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
OLSON, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1965. Retrieved from: http://commres.net/wiki/_media/olson.pdf. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
OSTROM, Elinor. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763.
PERSON, Anna; ROTHSTEIN, Bo; TEORELL, Jan. Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail - Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, v. 26, n. 3, p. 449-471, Jul. 2013 Retrieved from: https://exed.annenberg.usc.edu/sites/default/files/Persson_et_al-2013-Governance.pdf. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
ROTHSTEIN, Bo. Anti-Corruption: The Indirect “Big Bang” Approach. Review of International Political Economy, London, v. 18, p. 228-250, Jun. 2011. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692291003607834. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
SCHATZ, Florian. Fighting Corruption with Social Accountability: A Comparative Analysis of Social Accountability Mechanisms’ Potential to Reduce Corruption in Public Administration. Public Administration and Development, vol. 33, n.3, p. 161–174, Aug. 2013. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1648. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL. Corruption Perceptions INDEX 2022. Berlin: Transparency International, 2023. Retrieved from: https://x.gd/MJGyS. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
UNITED NATIONS GLOBAL COMPACT. Uniting Against Corruption: A playbook on anti-corruption collective action. Nova York: United Nations, 2021. Retrieved from: https://encurtador.com.br/ZLt3D. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
VALENCIA. Aldaia School Construction Integrity Pact. Spain: Transparency International Spain, 2005. Retrieved from: https://collective-action.com/explore/initiatives/1695/. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
VILLORIA MENDIETA, Manuel; JIMÉNEZ-SÁNCHEZ, Fernando. La corrupción en España (2004-2010): datos, percepción y efectos. Revista Española De Investigaciones Sociológicas, n. 138, p. 109–134, Feb. 2024. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.138.109. Acess: 01 jun. 2024.
VILLORIA, Manuel (org.). National Integrity System Assessment Spain. Espanha: Transparency International, 2011. DOI:10.13140/2.1.3146.8807.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Na qualidade de autor(es) da colaboração, original e inédita, sobre o qual me(nos) responsabilizo(amos) civil e penalmente pelo seu conteúdo, após ter lido as diretrizes para autores, concordado(amos) plenamente com as Políticas Editorias da Revista Novos Estudos Jurídicos - NEJ e autorizo(amos) a publicação na rede mundial de computadores (Internet), permitindo, também, que sua linguagem possa ser reformulada, caso seja necessário, sem que me(nos) seja devido qualquer pagamento a título de direitos autorais, podendo qualquer interessado acessá-lo e/ou reproduzi-lo mediante download, desde que a reprodução e/ou publicação obedeçam as normas da ABNT e tenham a finalidade exclusiva de uso por quem a consulta a título de divulgação da produção acadêmico científico.



















