O DIÁLOGO ENTRE JUÍZES NA FRAGMENTADA ORDEM DO DIREITO PÓS-NACIONAL

Fernando Lopes Ferraz  Elias

doi:10.14210/rdp.v21n1.p83-105

Authors

Fernando Lopes Ferraz Elias Faculdade de Direito de Franca - FDF https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-002X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14210/rdp.v21n1.p83-105

Keywords:

Post-national law, Constitutionalism, Pluralism, Dialogue between judges

Abstract

Background: Initially, we outline the main structural elements of the post-national legal order. Next, we highlight two opposing visions, constitutionalism and pluralism, aligning their proposals regarding post-national law, as well as the criticisms that are addressed to them. Finally, we investigate the existence of cross-interpretations between litigation of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and other instances of international conflict resolution, through of explicit and implicit references. Therefore, the present study is limited to issues pertinent to the structure of the post-national legal order, such as the relationship between different rights and jurisdictions.

Objectives: The objective of this article is to analyze the internationalization of law based on the dialogue between judges of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and those of other instances of international conflict resolution.

Method: For this, we carried out dogmatic-legal research, according to the hypothetical-deductive method, based on qualitative analysis and through the review of the specialized literature on the subject.

Results: We conclude that the new relations between the local and the global have implied a shift to a post-national legal order in which different rights and jurisdictions operate in separate but intermingling spheres, whose antagonisms can be minimized by the process of cross-fertilization as a tool for the construction of an order in international law by filling any gaps arising from the process of fragmentation of this law. Without manifesting pretensions to identify the content of this right, nor to exhaust the subject, the work aims to suggest the debate by the legal community by bringing theoretical and empirical contributions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fernando Lopes Ferraz Elias, Faculdade de Direito de Franca - FDF

Graduação em Direito pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (1998), Graduação em Relações Internacionais pela Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (1998), Mestrado em Relações Internacionais pela Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (2002). Doutorado em Direito pelo Centro Universitário de Brasília (2017). Experiência docente e de gestão acadêmica, desde 1999. Produção científica nas áreas de Direito e Relações Internacionais, com ênfase em Direito Internacional.

References

DELMAS-MARTY, M. Les forces imaginantes du droit. v. III: La refondation des pouvoirs, Paris: Seuil, 2007.

DELMAS-MARTY, M; IZORCHE, M-.L. Marge nationale d'appréciation et internationalisation du droit: réflexions sur la validité formelle d'un droit commun pluraliste. In: Revue internationale de droit comparé, v. 52, n. 4, oct.-déc., 2000, p. 753-780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ridc.2000.18627

DWORKIN, Ronald. Justiça para ouriços. Trad. Pedro Elói Duarte. Coimbra: Almedina, 2012. 515 p.

FARIA, J. E. O direito na economia globalizada. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2004.

IGNATIEFF, M (Org.). Human rights as politics and idolatry. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2001. 187 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400842841

KRASNER, Stephen D. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. 264 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400823260

KRISCH, Nico. Beyond constitucionalism: the pluralism structure of posnational law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 310 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228317.001.0001

LAFFER, C. A reconstrução dos direitos humanos: um diálogo com o pensamento de Hannah Arendt. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1988. 406 p.

MUTUA, Makau W. Savages, victims, and saviors: the metaphor of human rights. Harvard International Law Journal, v. 42, n. 1, p. 201-245, 2001. Disponível em: http://ssrn.com/abstract=15255471. Acesso em: 04 set. 2023.

NEVES, M. Transconstitucionalismo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009.

OST, F. Legal system between order and disorder. Oxford: Orford University Press, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198256922.001.0001

OST, F; KERCHOVE. De la pyramide au reseau: pour une théorie dialectique du droit. Bruxelles: Públications des Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis, 2002.

RAWLS, J. Le libéralisme politique. Paris: PUF, 1995.

SLAUGHTER, Anne-Marie. International law in a world of liberal states. European Journal of International Law, n. 503, 1995, p. 502-538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035934

TEUBNER, G. Constitutional fragments. Oxford: OUP, 2012.

TURGIS, Sandrine. Les Interactions entre les norme internationales relatives aux droits de la personne. Paris: Editions A. Pedone, 2010.

VARELLA, Marcelo Dias. Internacionalização do direito. Tese de Livre Docência. São Paulo, 2012.

WALDRON, Jeremy. Is Dignity the Foundation of Human Rights? New York University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper Series, Working Paper n. 12-73, Janeiro, 2013. Disponível em: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2196074 ou http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.21960743. Acesso em: 03 set. 2023.